Looking for an Auditra alternative?
Auditra is a credible Ontario PHIPA tool. If your clinic operates only in Ontario, it may be a fit. If you also handle Quebec or cross-provincial data — or want coverage built around the IPC's actual enforcement — here's an honest, sourced comparison.
Auditra vs Structura — the short answer
Auditra is an Ontario-only PHIPA gap-assessment tool with low published pricing. Structura Health covers PHIPA, Quebec Law 25, and PIPEDA across provinces, maps controls to the IPC's Decision 298 accountability standard, and is building AI-governance for the IPC's 2026 AI-scribe guidance.
Structura Health vs Auditra
A factual capability comparison. Where a tool partially covers a capability, that is shown as a partial mark rather than a cross.
| Capability | Structura Health | Auditra |
|---|---|---|
| PHIPA (Ontario) coverageBoth tools are built for Ontario's PHIPA framework. | ||
| Quebec Law 25 coverageLaw 25 carries penalties up to CAD $25M or 4% of global revenue — the single biggest coverage gap. | ||
| PIPEDA / multi-provinceCross-provincial and cross-border flows for clinics operating in more than one province. | ||
| Free no-login gap assessmentAuditra offers a free 18-question assessment; Structura offers a free 10-question PHIPA scorecard. | ||
| AI-governance moduleFor the IPC's Jan-2026 AI-scribe guidance (pre-deploy PIA, vendor due-diligence). On Structura's roadmap; absent from Auditra. | ||
| PIA-ready export (IPC + CAI formats) | ||
| Canadian data residencyAuditra hosts on Azure Canada Central. Canadian data residency is on Structura's roadmap, not yet current infrastructure. | ||
| CAD pricing |
Legend: check = covered · dash = partial · cross = not covered. Comparison based on Auditra's publicly published scope and pricing (auditra.ca), Ontario IPC guidance, and CAI Law 25 guidance, as of June 2026. Capabilities marked as roadmap are noted as such. SOC 2 Type II is a roadmap milestone for Structura, not a current certification.
The differences that matter
Auditra is Ontario-only; Structura is multi-province
Auditra's published scope is PHIPA and Ontario. Structura covers PHIPA (Ontario), Quebec Law 25, and PIPEDA in one platform — so a clinic that treats Quebec patients or operates across provinces doesn't need a second tool to close the Law 25 gap.
Built around enforcement, not just a checklist
Structura's controls map to the six accountability areas the IPC identified in Decision 298 (2025) — Canada's first PHIPA monetary penalties — and produce the documented, repeatable evidence the IPC said it expects.
Designed for the AI-scribe era
After the IPC's January 2026 AI-scribe guidance, clinics running AI tools have new governance obligations (pre-deploy PIAs, vendor due-diligence, consent handling). Structura's roadmap addresses AI governance directly; Auditra's published scope does not.
Common questions
Is Structura an Auditra alternative?
Yes. Both are PHIPA gap-assessment and compliance tools for Canadian clinics. Structura extends beyond Auditra's Ontario-only scope, with Quebec Law 25 and PIPEDA coverage plus AI-governance and PIA-export capabilities on its roadmap — capabilities Auditra does not offer.
Does Auditra cover Quebec Law 25?
Based on its published scope, Auditra is focused on Ontario PHIPA and does not cover Quebec's Law 25. Clinics that treat Quebec patients or transfer data to Quebec have Law 25 obligations, including mandatory Privacy Impact Assessments and prompt breach notice to the CAI — in practice run against a 72-hour internal target.
Which is cheaper, Auditra or Structura?
Auditra advertises lower published price points. Structura is priced higher per clinic but includes multi-province coverage (PHIPA, Law 25, PIPEDA), PIA exports, and a human support layer. The right choice depends on whether a clinic operates in more than one province.
Do I need multi-province coverage?
If your clinic operates only in Ontario and never handles Quebec residents' data, Ontario-only PHIPA coverage may be enough. If you treat Quebec patients, transfer data across provinces, or plan to expand, multi-province coverage avoids a separate Law 25 gap.
Compare us on evidence, not claims.
Book a demo and judge the platform against your clinic's actual requirements.